|
![]() |
Final report Study of Peregrine Falcons Wintering on the Gulf Coast of Mexico |
![]() |
Abstract Fundación
Ara and Earthspan conducted a study of peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus)
wintering on the Gulf coast of Mexico. Data collection occurred between
January 1997 and October 1998. The main aim of the study was to better
understand the movements of peregrine falcons on their wintering grounds.
Other objectives were to track peregrines to their breeding areas and
back to the wintering grounds. Earthspan provided Geographical Information
Systems (GIS) training and support. An area of apparent high density of wintering peregrines was identified near Matamoros. In 1998, two aerial and one ground-based shorebird counts were made in the lower Laguna Madre. Aerial counts were made in February and April and were of 8,981 and 7,345 individuals, respectively. These were primarily ‘small shorebirds’ that could not be identified to the species level. Ground-based counts were of 14,043 individuals, primarily western and least sandpipers. Many dead sea turtles were seen on the beach during the survey. Earthspan provided set-up and training in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and database management. The aim was to provide Ara with an ability to display and undertake preliminary analyses.
A
feature of peregrine falcons in many parts of the world is their migratory
behavior. Some spend more time in the wintering areas than they do on
the breeding grounds. Many that winter along the coast of the Gulf of
Mexico breed in arctic regions of North America and Greenland. Contaminants
such as We present data from peregrine falcons fitted with satellite-based telemetry technology. The data record the movement of the birds during much of their wintering time in 1996/97 and 1997/98. They also detail the timing of migration, and the migratory path for some birds. Data suggest likely breeding areas of these birds. This document summarizes the work on peregrine falcons, and consolidates information from monthly and quarterly reports, Nov 1996-July 1998. Study Area, Materials, and Methods Survey, capture, instrumentation and monitoring of falcons Our study occurred on the Mexican Gulf coast between 23o00’and 24o00’ N latitudes in the state of Tamaulipas, centered on the towns of La Pesca and Tepejuahe. Some capture and survey effort was put into the beach area near Matamoros. This area was chosen for the relative ease of access to the beach and location in an area where an Intracoastal Waterway is being proposed. The portion of coast within the study area is characterized barrier islands that separate the Laguna Madre from the Gulf of Mexico vary in width from about 100 m up to 2-km. At high tide, the sandy beach is about 5-20 m in width. The western side of the islands are covered in vegetation including grasses (e.g. seacoast bluestem, Schizachyrium scoparium littoralis) and small shrubs (e.g partridge pea, Cassia fasiculata). The Laguna Madre is cut in a N-S direction by a channel, which remains filled with water throughout the year. The mud flats on either side of the channel are sometimes dry, but are sometimes covered by shallow water. Weather conditions play a role in the extent to which the mud flats are flooded. Local people indicate that the laguna is flooded mostly in the winter. The mainland in our study area has been largely converted to ranch use. Forests that exist are either small relicts of the original vegetation or are secondary growth. Falcons
were trapped using noose-harnessed pigeons under permits issued to Fundación
Ara by the Mexican government. T. Maechtle provided USFWS bands listed
under his permit. Measurements were taken for all captured birds. Capture
locations were recorded using a hand-held GPS reciever. Once trapped,
peregrines were hooded, aged, sexed and measured. In 1997 blood was drawn
for future Data on falcon locations were collected by the ARGOS system. Data were downloaded by Earthspan and sent ot Fundación Ara at least once per week. Location estimates collected by ARGOS are categorized according to likely accuracy (Z,B,A, 0,1,2,3 in ascending order of accuracy). Location classes 1, 2 and 3 mean that 68% of location estimates would lie within a radius of 1 km, 350 m and 150m respectively. We used only location classes 1-3 for our analyses. Location estimates were displayed within the ArcView GIS (ESRI, Redlands, Ca.) environment, and analyses of the areas covered by the falcons was done using RANGES V (ITE, Dorset, U.K.) software. We described areas used by peregrines during the winter by minimum polygon area analysis. Shorebird surveys In
1997, a pilot study of prey assessments using point counts of the laguna
and transects along the beach revealed that these methods would not be
useful in counting shorebirds in the study area. In 1998, two surveys
were conducted by aircraft, and was supplemented by a ground-based count.
The same team that performed aerial surveys conducted the ground survey.
A more detailed description of shorebird survey methods used in 1998 can
be found in quarterly reports of April and July 1998. Results Survey and capture of falcons From 11-24 January 1997 and 17 February – 11 March 1998 fieldwork aimed at the capture and fitting of PTTs to wintering peregrine falcons was undertaken. Surveys were conducted along the beach connecting Matamoros, La Pesca, Tepejuahe, and Tampico. Locations of falcons sighted by the falcon capture team and by the shorebird survey team while conducting ground based shorebird counts are summarized in Appendix 1, Tables 1 and 2. Locations are mapped in Appendix 2 Map 1. A maximum of 17 falcons were seen but not captured in 1997. In 1998 a maximum of 31 were seen and not captured. The shorebird survey team observed a maximum of 15 peregrine falcons in the winter of 1997/98. Over the two years of the study 33 peregrine falcons were captured, only two were males. Table 2 summarizes these captures; Appendix 2, Map 1 maps the capture locations. This sex bias in capture was indicative of the ratio of male and female falcons seen on the beach. Throughout the period of fieldwork, only 4-5 male peregrine falcons sere seenIn 1997, ten adult peregrine falcons were captured (1 male and 9 females). In 1998, 22 wintering peregrines (1 male and 21 females) were captured, and one was recaptured. Fourteen PTTs were fitted to peregrines, (6 females in 1997, and 1 male and 7 females in 1998). Three falcons captured in 1998 had been caught in previous years (two were tagged with PTTs in 1997, and one had been caught in 1996). All three of these were fitted with PTTs in 1998. Appendix 2, Map 1 shows the location of peregrine sighted and captured. Locations of capture for birds trapped in both years of the study were found close to one another. Wintering areas – location, size, and composition Appendix 2, Maps 2 and 3 show the scatter of location estimates received for peregrine falcons marked in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Appendix 2, Maps 4 and 5 show the convex polygons that describe the ranging of wintering peregrines at the 90% and 50% levels in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Table 3 shows the areas covered by these polygons. Most peregrines stayed throughout the winter period on the stretch of beach where they were captured. Some birds (14505, 12845, 12850, and 12851) did shift their movement patterns so that more than one area of activity concentration were evident (See Maps 2 and 3.). In most cases these movements were along a north-south axis and represent no change in the general habitat used by the peregrines (i.e. beach and laguna). Falcon 12850 did move from the beach where it was captured to an area along a creek. When the ranges of birds that shifted their areas of activity concentration were removed, the size of the ranges in 1997 were larger than those in 1998 at both the 50% (P= 0.003, F test) and 90% level ( P= 0.005, F-test). For both birds that were marked in both years ranges at the 50% and 90% level were larger in 1997 than in 1998 (Table 4). Appendix 2, Map 5 shows the location estimates of peregrines that were tagged in both years. The
entire report, without maps, is available as a PDF download
|
|